Jurassic World Rebirth
Jurassic World Rebirth is a $200 million movie that feels like it was written on a napkin during a studio lunch meeting. The pitch: 'What if we did Jurassic Park again, but with Scarlett Johansson and a new island?' The execution: exactly that, with nothing underneath.
Full analysis belowNOT A WOKE TRAP. The film's mildly woke elements, including the infallible female lead, evil corporate greed, and the absence of meaningfully flawed female characters, are standard-issue franchise filmmaking. Nothing is concealed. The Jurassic franchise has always run on corporate villainy and 'nature fights back' environmentalism. Rebirth doesn't hide what it is. It just isn't very interesting about it.
Jurassic World Rebirth is a $200 million movie that feels like it was written on a napkin during a studio lunch meeting. The pitch: 'What if we did Jurassic Park again, but with Scarlett Johansson and a new island?' The execution: exactly that, with nothing underneath.
Set five years after Jurassic World Dominion, Rebirth takes place in a world where dinosaurs are going extinct in the wild, surviving only in isolated equatorial zones. Zora Bennett (Scarlett Johansson), a covert operations expert, is hired by pharmaceutical company ParkerGenix to lead a team onto Ile Saint-Hubert, a restricted island once operated by InGen, to harvest genetic material from the three largest dinosaur species. ParkerGenix claims this DNA holds the key to a miracle drug that could cure heart disease.
The team includes paleontologist Dr. Henry Loomis (Jonathan Bailey) and the stoic Duncan Kincaid (Mahershala Ali). Their mission intersects with a civilian family, the Delgados, whose boating trip goes sideways, stranding everyone on the island together. From there it's a series of dinosaur encounters, corporate betrayals, and narrow escapes that feel assembled from spare parts of every previous Jurassic film.
Let's start with what works: the dinosaurs. Gareth Edwards knows how to frame large creatures against human-scale environments, and a few of the set pieces deliver genuine spectacle. The underwater sequence involving the sea dinosaur is the film's high point, with real tension and impressive VFX work. Edwards occasionally recaptures the 'small humans in a big world' feeling that made the original Jurassic Park magical.
Now the problems, which are extensive.
Scarlett Johansson is miscast. She's a talented actress, but she's not physically convincing as a 'grizzled covert operations expert' and the script does nothing to sell the conceit. Zora never makes a mistake that isn't caused by external forces. She outsmarts every man in the room. She delivers mild put-downs to her male colleagues with a self-aware smile that softens the girl-boss energy but doesn't eliminate it. It's a step down from Bryce Dallas Howard's Claire, who at least had an arc in the original Jurassic World. Zora arrives fully formed and stays that way.
The civilian family subplot is dead weight. The Delgados exist to give the film a 'heart' that it never earns. They're pleasant, generic, and completely disconnected from the main plot until the third act forces everyone together. The runtime could lose 25 minutes of Delgado family scenes and improve dramatically.
David Koepp's script is remarkably lazy. The three DNA extraction missions play out as virtually identical fetch quests. Find the dinosaur, extract the sample, run from something bigger. Repeat three times. The corporate villain, Martin Krebs (Rupert Friend), is so telegraphed that his betrayal lands with zero impact. And the hybrid dinosaurs, teased in marketing, show up only in the final minutes and add nothing except a vague sense that someone remembered to check the 'franchise escalation' box.
The male characters are competent but uniformly subordinate to Zora's leadership. Mahershala Ali, one of the best actors working today, is given almost nothing to do. Jonathan Bailey gets the 'nerdy scientist who says interesting things' role but never develops beyond it. The only character with significant flaws is the white male villain, which is so standard at this point that it barely registers as a choice.
Here's the thing about Jurassic World Rebirth: it's not aggressively woke. It's passively woke. The girl-boss lead, the evil pharmaceutical corporation, the 'only men are flawed' character design, the diverse cast arranged around a white female savior at the center. None of this is hidden or surprising. It's just the default Hollywood template applied without thought or conviction. The film doesn't believe in anything strongly enough to be offensive. It's too empty for that.
Gareth Edwards brings technical skill to a script that doesn't deserve it. A few sequences look genuinely great. But spectacle without character investment is just noise, and Rebirth is mostly noise. The Jurassic franchise has been running on nostalgia fumes since 2015, and Rebirth confirms what Dominion suggested: the tank is empty.
The $340 million domestic gross proves, once again, that audiences will show up for dinosaurs regardless of quality. Universal will make three more of these. They'll probably all be exactly like this one.
Formula: Weighted Score = Severity × Authenticity Multiplier × Centrality Multiplier
🔴 Woke Tropes
| Trope | Severity | Authenticity | Centrality | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Infallible Female Lead (Girl Boss) | 3 | Low | High | 7.56 |
| Evil Corporation / Anti-Capitalist Framing | 3 | High | Moderate | 2.1 |
| Only Men Are Flawed Characters | 3 | Low | Moderate | 4.2 |
| TOTAL WOKE | 13.9 | |||
🟢 Traditional Tropes
| Trope | Severity | Authenticity | Centrality | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Family Protection Under Threat | 3 | Moderate | Moderate | 3 |
| Human Ingenuity vs. Nature | 3 | High | Moderate | 2.1 |
| Respect for the Natural World | 2 | High | Moderate | 1.4 |
| Sacrifice and Teamwork | 3 | Moderate | Low | 1.5 |
| Consequences of Playing God | 3 | High | Low | 1.05 |
| TOTAL TRADITIONAL | 9.1 | |||
Score Margin: +4 WOKE
Director: Gareth Edwards
NEUTRAL TO MILDLY WOKE. Edwards makes technically accomplished spectacle films with minimal ideological agendaEdwards broke through with Monsters (2010), a micro-budget sci-fi film about migration and borders that carried faint political undertones. Godzilla (2014) was pure spectacle, though it sidelined its male lead so aggressively that audiences joked about paying to watch Bryan Cranston die. Rogue One: A Star Wars Story (2016) was the franchise's most militaristic and least ideological entry, with a strong female lead who earned her status through competence. The Creator (2023) was a visually stunning AI allegory that leaned sympathetically toward the machines. Edwards doesn't appear to have a strong political agenda; his films care more about scale and visual storytelling than messaging. He's a technician, not an activist.
Writer: David Koepp
Koepp is one of Hollywood's most prolific and reliable screenwriters. He wrote the original Jurassic Park (1993) and The Lost World (1997), along with Spider-Man, Mission: Impossible, Panic Room, War of the Worlds, and dozens of others. His return to the franchise after nearly 30 years was meant to signal a back-to-basics approach. The results suggest he's running on fumes rather than inspiration. Koepp is not an ideological writer; his scripts tend to be structurally competent and character-light.
Adult Viewer Insight
Conservative adults won't find anything overtly offensive here, just the standard-issue Hollywood product: a female-led action ensemble where only men are meaningfully flawed, a corporate villain motivated by greed, and diverse casting treated as a checkbox rather than a storytelling choice. Scarlett Johansson is likable but miscast, and Mahershala Ali is criminally underused. The dinosaur sequences deliver occasional spectacle. The human drama delivers nothing. If you enjoyed any of the post-2015 Jurassic films, this is more of the same. If you didn't, there's no reason to start now. Perfectly fine as background noise on a long flight.
Parental Guidance
Recommended age: 10+ for sustained dinosaur action and mild peril. The violence is intense but bloodless. Dinosaurs chase, bite, and throw humans, but graphic gore is avoided. There's one human death scene played for dramatic weight. No sexual content. No meaningful language concerns. The corporate greed subplot is uncomplicated enough for kids to follow. The environmental messaging is mild: dinosaurs are going extinct, and a pharmaceutical company wants to exploit them. There's nothing here that requires a difficult parental conversation. It's standard blockbuster fare.
Community Discussion 0
Subscribe to comment.
Join the VirtueVigil community to share your perspective on this review.