Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes
Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes is a franchise revival that earns its existence — a rarer achievement than it sounds in an era of constant reboots.…
Full analysis belowThe Apes franchise has always been allegorical about oppression and freedom. Kingdom's specific allegory — a dictator who weaponizes a founding leader's legacy to justify his own tyranny — is more politically legible as a warning against authoritarian leaders co-opting tradition than as progressive ideology. The film's traditionalist values (loyalty, community, courage, honest leadership) are its dominant moral content.
Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes is a franchise revival that earns its existence — a rarer achievement than it sounds in an era of constant reboots. Set three centuries after the death of Caesar and the events of the original trilogy, the film establishes a new world where apes have built complex societies while humanity has regressed to a feral state. Director Wes Ball brings propulsive energy and genuine emotional stakes to what could have been a paint-by-numbers reboot, and the result is the strongest entry in the franchise since Dawn of the Planet of the Apes in 2014.
The protagonist is Noa (Owen Teague), a young ape from a peaceful eagle-keeping clan whose world is shattered when a tyrannical ape leader named Proximus Caesar (Kevin Durand) raids his village, enslaves his clan, and destroys his home. What follows is a survival and rescue story that also becomes a meditation on how authoritarian leaders corrupt the legacies of genuine founders. Proximus has built his power by invoking Caesar's name and memory — claiming to be the authentic heir to Caesar's vision while practicing exactly the kind of domination Caesar spent his life fighting against. This is the film's most interesting thematic territory, and the script handles it with more intelligence than you'd expect from a summer blockbuster.
Durand's Proximus Caesar is a genuinely compelling villain — an ape who has studied human history and weaponized its lessons, who speaks in the cadences of a visionary leader while operating as a pure tyrant. His invocation of Caesar's legacy to justify his rule is a sharp observation about how political movements calcify into their opposite when taken over by power-seekers who hijack the founder's name. This is a traditional conservative insight — that institutions and movements are only as good as the people running them at any given moment, and that the reverence of legacy can be exploited just as easily as it can be honored.
Mae (Freya Allan) is the human wild card — a woman who appears feral but is concealing her intelligence and her own agenda. Her relationship with Noa evolves from mutual suspicion into genuine alliance, and the film is smart enough to give both of them something to want and something to sacrifice. Raka (Peter Macon), an ape who has remained faithful to Caesar's original principles rather than Proximus's perversion of them, provides the film's moral anchor — a living embodiment of what leadership based on genuine principle looks like versus leadership based on the theater of principle.
From a VirtueVigil perspective, this film scores considerably better than its franchise pedigree might suggest. The core values are deeply traditional: community loyalty (Noa's central motivation is rescuing his clan), physical courage, honest leadership versus corrupt demagoguery, and the importance of community as the basic social unit worth defending. The oppression allegory that runs through all Apes films is present but functions here primarily as adventure context rather than as a progressive lecture. Nobody stops the action to explain colonialism. The film trusts its audience to draw the thematic connections without having its nose rubbed in them.
The film is not without progressive elements. Mae's agency and intelligence are coded in ways that reflect contemporary sensibilities about capable female characters in adventure films. The ensemble of enslaved apes is diverse in ways that carry implicit diversity messaging. But these elements are functional rather than agenda-driven — they serve the story rather than interrupting it to send a message.
Visually, Ball delivers impressive work. The ape civilization designs are inventive and plausible. The action sequences have genuine stakes. The motion-capture performances — particularly Teague and Durand — are emotionally legible in ways that CGI-heavy films sometimes fail to achieve. The film ends on an open note that clearly establishes future installments, but it tells a complete story within its runtime rather than simply serving as setup. For conservative viewers looking for a summer blockbuster with genuine traditional values at its core — community, loyalty, courage, the difference between real leadership and its counterfeit — Kingdom delivers.
| Trope | Category | Location | Authenticity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Institutional Evil / Authoritarian Villain | WOKE | Proximus Caesar's slave empire — apes enslaving apes in the name of Caesar's legacy | Natural. The Apes franchise has always positioned institutional tyranny as the enemy. Genre convention, not progressive insertion. |
| Oppression Allegory | WOKE | Enslaved ape clans; Proximus's extractive empire building on forced labor | Natural. Planet of the Apes has carried a freedom-vs-oppression allegory since 1968. Not a modern DEI insertion. |
| Strong Female Agency | WOKE | Mae — a human woman concealing intelligence and pursuing her own agenda within the ape world | Natural. Mae's agency serves the plot. Her competence is not ideologically foregrounded; it's functionally required. |
| Community and Belonging | TRAD | Noa's central motivation — rescuing his clan and restoring his community; the eagle-keeping clan as a tight-knit traditional community | Organic. Community loyalty as the engine of heroism is the film's core traditional value. |
| Defense of the Innocent | TRAD | Noa's entire arc — the rescue of enslaved clan members at personal risk | Organic. The heroic motivation is protection of the vulnerable rather than ideological mission. |
| Honest Leadership vs. Corrupt Demagoguery | TRAD | Raka as embodiment of Caesar's genuine principles vs. Proximus's co-option of Caesar's name for tyranny | Organic. The film's central thematic argument — that true leadership is defined by service, not the appropriation of another's legacy — is deeply traditional. |
| Warrior Code and Physical Courage | TRAD | Noa's physical confrontations; ape warrior culture; the discipline of the eagle-keeping clan | Organic. Physical courage and martial discipline as positive values are present throughout. |
| Loyalty to Family and Tribe | TRAD | Noa's loyalty to his father's memory and his clan; Raka's loyalty to Caesar's principles over personal safety | Organic. Familial and tribal loyalty as the basis of moral action is the film's emotional foundation. |
| Warning Against False Prophets / Demagogues | TRAD | Proximus Caesar — a leader who invokes sacred founding principles to justify their opposite; the film's moral verdict against him is unambiguous | Organic. The warning against leaders who weaponize founders' legacies is one of the most classically conservative political insights. |
Director: Wes Ball
GENRE-NEUTRAL — adventure filmmaker, no strong ideological signalWes Ball directed the Maze Runner trilogy (2014-2018) — dystopian YA fiction with themes of institutional control and youth rebellion. His output is genre-first. Ball approaches Kingdom as an adventure filmmaker rather than an ideologue. His Maze Runner films are morally straightforward: institutions that oppress young people are wrong; courage and loyalty are right. He brings the same moral clarity to Kingdom. No strong progressive ideological agenda in his filmography.
Writer: Josh Friedman
Josh Friedman has credits including War of the Worlds (2005 Spielberg version) and Avatar 2 (co-writer). He is a genre craftsman with experience in large-scale sci-fi. His Planet of the Apes script emphasizes character and adventure over ideological argument. The oppression allegory is present but functions as genre convention rather than contemporary political statement.
Producers
- Rick Jaffa and Amanda Silver (20th Century Studios) — The married team who wrote and produced the Caesar trilogy (Rise, Dawn, War). Their Planet of the Apes work emphasizes family, community, and the corrupting nature of power. The trilogy was generally praised by conservative viewers for its moral clarity. Their involvement signals continuity with the Caesar trilogy's values-based storytelling.
- Jason Reed (20th Century Studios) — Studio executive producer. No independent ideological signal.
- Joe Hartwick Jr. — Producing partner to Wes Ball. No independent ideological signal.
Full Cast
Fidelity Casting Analysis FAITHFUL
No canon-swap concerns. Original characters, no source character demographic violations.
Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes takes place 300 years after the Caesar trilogy and features an almost entirely original cast of characters. Noa, Mae/Nova, Proximus Caesar, and Raka are new characters with no prior established casting to violate. The film pays homage to Caesar's legacy through the villain Proximus, who weaponizes Caesar's memory — a clever narrative device. The franchise's diverse casting tradition (apes of various species and apparent ethnicity-coded clans) is genre-appropriate and does not represent revisionism of established characters. No fidelity concerns.
Adult Viewer Insight
Conservative viewers will find Kingdom's central argument — that charismatic leaders who invoke the names of genuine founders while practicing tyranny are the most dangerous kind — resonant and timely without being preachy. The film's vision of community worth defending and courage required to defend it is traditionally grounded. This is blockbuster entertainment that doesn't require you to check your values at the door.
Parental Guidance
Ages 12+ recommended. - Violence: Moderate — action sequences, battle scenes, a village raid with implied deaths, nothing gratuitously graphic - Language: Mild — family-friendly action film - Sexual content: None - Thematic content: Tyranny vs. freedom, loss of community, slavery/captivity, corruption of ideals, courage under pressure - The film deals with themes of captivity and community destruction that may be intense for younger children - Excellent discussion starter for teens: the difference between leaders who honor founding principles and those who weaponize them. Applicable to political, religious, and community contexts. - Appropriate for families with children 10+ with parental discussion.
Community Discussion 0
Subscribe to comment.
Join the VirtueVigil community to share your perspective on this review.