Mercy (2026)
Timur Bekmambetov's Mercy arrives with a killer premise and proceeds to do almost nothing interesting with it. An LAPD detective wakes up strapped to an execution chair, put on trial by an AI judge for murdering his wife, given 90 minutes to prove he didn't do it. Strong hook. Ticking clock.…
Full analysis below
NOT A WOKE TRAP Mercy is not hiding a progressive agenda behind a genre shell. The film sets up a dystopian system that strips away civil liberties and then celebrates those same surveillance tools as the hero's salvation. This is corporate incoherence from Amazon MGM Studios, not progressive ideology smuggled into entertainment.
Timur Bekmambetov's Mercy arrives with a killer premise and proceeds to do almost nothing interesting with it. An LAPD detective wakes up strapped to an execution chair, put on trial by an AI judge for murdering his wife, given 90 minutes to prove he didn't do it. Strong hook. Ticking clock. Man against machine. Life and death on the line. It should work. For stretches it almost does. Then you start thinking about what the movie is actually saying, and the whole thing falls apart like wet cardboard.
Plot Summary
Chris Pratt plays Detective Chris Raven, a cop who championed the Mercy Court system. Near-future Los Angeles, crime spiraling out of control, tent cities and red zones choking the arteries of the city. AI judges handle capital cases with brutal efficiency. Eighteen defendants before Raven. All eighteen executed. No jury. No appeal. Just the algorithm and a countdown.
Raven is accused of murdering his estranged wife Nicole. His guilt probability sits at 97%. He needs to get it below 92% or he gets a lethal sonic pulse. Judge Maddox, the AI presiding over his case, gives him access to every piece of surveillance available. Emails, texts, doorbell cameras, parking lot footage, phone records. The clock runs while Raven pieces together who actually killed his wife.
The real killer is Rob Nelson, his AA sponsor and Nicole's coworker. Rob's foster brother David Webb was the very first person executed by the Mercy Court, which Raven himself had championed. It's a revenge scheme built on a foundation of institutional failure. Rob kidnaps Raven's daughter Britt and plans to bomb the entire Mercy Court building. Raven's partner Jaq Diallo turns out to be complicit. The system was corrupt from day one.
Trope Analysis
Woke Tropes
| Trope | Severity (1-5) | Authenticity | Centrality | Weighted Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Surveillance Normalization — total access to private data presented as heroic tool | 4 | Neutral — needed for plot, but unresolved contradiction | Central | 6.0 |
| Institutional Evil (Inverted) — LAPD and Mercy Court shown as corruptible | 3 | Natural — baked into premise | Supporting | 6.75 |
| Techno-Utopianism — Raven reconciles with AI system despite catastrophic record | 2 | Injected — contradicts everything film just argued | Background | 3.0 |
| WOKE TOTAL | 5 |
Traditional Tropes
| Trope | Severity (1-5) | Authenticity | Centrality | Weighted Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Family as Anchor — father-daughter bond drives every decision | 5 | Organic — story collapses without it | Defining | 10.0 |
| Due Process and Rule of Law — entire premise argues for constitutional protections | 5 | Organic — inseparable from premise | Defining | 10.0 |
| Self-Sacrificing Hero — Raven stays in chair after clearing himself to save Britt | 4 | Organic | Central | 9.0 |
| Skepticism of Government Power — Mercy Court as unchecked state authority | 4 | Organic | Central | 6.0 |
| Personal Responsibility and Redemption — Raven owns his alcoholism without excuses | 3 | Natural | Supporting | 4.5 |
| Mercy Over Vengeance — Raven chooses not to kill Rob | 3 | Natural | Supporting | 4.5 |
| TRAD TOTAL | 8 |
Creative Team Analysis
Timur Bekmambetov (Director): Kazakh-born genre specialist. Career encompasses Russian dark fantasy (Night Watch, Day Watch), American action absurdism (Wanted, Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter), and screenlife format innovation (produced Searching and Unfriended: Dark Web). He is not an ideologue. He is a format experimenter. His interest is in how surveillance footage and screen-mediated reality can be weaponized cinematically. Mercy applies these instincts to a legal thriller framework. The result is visually distinctive and thematically thin. Ideological signal: NEUTRAL.
Marco van Belle (Writer): Debut feature. The screenplay's central paradox, critiquing a surveillance apparatus while using that same apparatus as the hero's salvation, reads as structural inexperience rather than political agenda. The personal responsibility arc and the antagonist twist show genuine craft. The muddled ending suggests a writer who had not fully thought through the implications of his own premise.
Charles Roven / Atlas Entertainment (Producer): Dark Knight trilogy, Man of Steel. Commercial prestige producer with no specific political signal. Follows franchiseable talent and high-concept premises.
Amazon MGM Studios: The corporate fingerprint on Mercy matters. Amazon is one of the world's largest surveillance infrastructure companies. A film produced by Amazon that concludes AI-driven surveillance justice is acceptable when properly administered is not a neutral editorial position. This is not conspiracy — it is corporate interest expressing itself through content. The soft landing of the final act should be read in this context.
Ramin Djawadi (Composer): Game of Thrones, Westworld, Iron Man, Pacific Rim. Characteristically propulsive and atmospheric. Elevates the material more than it deserves. No political signal.
Adult Viewer Insight
Conservative adults should approach Mercy as a flawed but occasionally interesting thought experiment about what happens when due process gets traded away for efficiency. The film makes the conservative case for constitutional protections better than it intends to. Watch it as a conversation starter about AI, surveillance, government power, and the irreplaceable role of human judgment in matters of life and death.
The bigger concern is what the film normalizes without examining. Total surveillance is presented as a feature, not a bug. Amazon's fingerprints are visible in the final act's soft landing. The movie will not radicalize anyone. But it will, if watched uncritically, leave viewers with a vague sense that surveillance is fine when the right people run it. That is worth addressing directly.
Chris Pratt is likable. The family stakes are real. The personal responsibility arc is honest. Ramin Djawadi's score does what it always does. These are genuine strengths. Go in with calibrated expectations and you will find something worth watching, even if you also find things worth pushing back on.
Formula: Weighted Score = Severity × Authenticity Multiplier × Centrality Multiplier
🔴 Woke Tropes
| Trope | Severity | Authenticity | Centrality | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Surveillance Normalization | 4 | Neutral | Central | 6 |
| Institutional Evil (Inverted) | 3 | Natural | Supporting | 6.75 |
| Techno-Utopianism | 2 | Injected | Background | 3 |
| TOTAL WOKE | 15.8 | |||
🟢 Traditional Tropes
| Trope | Severity | Authenticity | Centrality | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Family as Anchor | 5 | Organic | Defining | 10 |
| Due Process and Rule of Law | 5 | Organic | Defining | 10 |
| The Self-Sacrificing Hero | 4 | Organic | Central | 9 |
| Skepticism of Government Power | 4 | Organic | Central | 6 |
| Personal Responsibility and Redemption | 3 | Natural | Supporting | 4.5 |
| Mercy Over Vengeance | 3 | Natural | Supporting | 4.5 |
| TOTAL TRADITIONAL | 44.0 | |||
Score Margin: +3 TRAD
Director: Timur Bekmambetov
NEUTRALKazakh-born Russian filmmaker who built his career on genre spectacle and technological innovation. Pioneered the screenlife genre (Searching, Unfriended). Not an ideologue. His primary interest is format experimentation, not politics. Night Watch, Wanted, Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter — genre across the spectrum. Ideological tendency: NEUTRAL.
Writer: Marco van Belle
Debut feature screenplay. No prior film credits. No established political profile. The screenplay's structural paradox — critiquing surveillance while using surveillance as the hero's salvation — reads as inexperience rather than agenda.
Fidelity Casting Analysis N/A
Original near-future IP. No historical period, source novel, or established canon to assess. Cast diversity reflects plausible near-future Los Angeles demographics without calling attention to itself as a statement.
Mercy is set in a fictional near-future and based on an original screenplay. There is no historical period, literary source, or real-world figure to assess for casting fidelity. Kali Reis (Native American and Cape Verdean heritage) is cast in a physically demanding role that matches her actual background as a professional boxer. No canon deviation is possible when no canon exists.
Adult Viewer Insight
Conservative adults should approach Mercy as a flawed but occasionally interesting thought experiment about the limits of technology in dispensing justice. The film's strongest conservative credentials are structural rather than intentional. The entire plot demonstrates what happens when due process is abandoned. The constitutional protections conservatives champion, the right to counsel, trial by jury, the presumption of innocence, are all absent in the Mercy Court, and the results are exactly as catastrophic as you'd predict. The bigger concern is what the film normalizes without examining. Total surveillance is presented as a feature, not a bug. Amazon's fingerprints are on every frame. Watch it as a conversation starter about AI, due process, and the surveillance state. Just don't expect the film itself to have good answers.
Parental Guidance
Violence: Moderate to heavy for PG-13. A woman is stabbed to death (fragmented flashback). Multiple SWAT team members killed in an explosion. A truck loaded with explosives crashes into a building. Physical fighting in the climax. The execution mechanism (lethal sonic pulse) is described but not graphically depicted. Sexual Content: Minimal. An extramarital affair discussed but not shown. No nudity. Language: Moderate. Consistent with mainstream crime thriller. Substance Use: Raven's alcoholism is a significant, honestly depicted plot element. His relapse and path toward accountability shown without glamorizing addiction. Scary/Intense: Sustained ticking-clock tension throughout. A teenager kidnapped in the final act. The concept of being executed by an algorithm without jury or appeal may disturb thoughtful younger viewers. Ideological Content: - Surveillance normalization: present and unaddressed - Family values: strong — father-daughter bond is the emotional core - Faith content: absent - Due process: positively framed throughout Age Recommendation: 13 and up with parental engagement. Discussion Starters: 1. The Mercy Court promises efficiency. What does it sacrifice? Are those tradeoffs worth it? 2. Raven uses the surveillance tools the film seems to criticize to save himself. Does the movie notice this contradiction? 3. Raven owns his alcoholism without excuses. When do we see that kind of honest accountability in movies? 4. The villain's motive is revenge for his brother's wrongful execution. Does that make him sympathetic? 5. Amazon produced this movie. Amazon also sells surveillance technology. Does that matter when you evaluate the ending?
Community Discussion 0
Subscribe to comment.
Join the VirtueVigil community to share your perspective on this review.