Mulan
Disney's 2020 Mulan is a visually gorgeous but narratively confused film that manages to simultaneously offend fans of the 1998 animated original, Chinese audiences, Western feminists, and human rights advocates. That is a remarkable achievement in alienating every possible constituency.
Full analysis belowThis film draws you in for a significant portion of its runtime with traditional or neutral content before springing its woke agenda. Know before you go!
NOT A WOKE TRAP. The woke content in Mulan 2020 is present from the opening scene. Young Mulan displays supernatural chi powers in the first five minutes, her parents discuss how she must hide her gift because girls are not supposed to have it, and the feminist framework is established before the title card. There is no bait-and-switch. The film telegraphs its ideological commitments from frame one.
Disney's 2020 Mulan is a visually gorgeous but narratively confused film that manages to simultaneously offend fans of the 1998 animated original, Chinese audiences, Western feminists, and human rights advocates. That is a remarkable achievement in alienating every possible constituency.
The bones of the story remain: Hua Mulan disguises herself as a man to take her ailing father's place in the Imperial Army, fights the invading Rouran forces, earns the respect of her fellow soldiers, and saves the Emperor. The skeleton is intact. Everything that made it work has been stripped out and replaced with something blander.
The most consequential change is the addition of chi powers. In the 1998 original, Mulan succeeded through cleverness, determination, and hard work. She was an ordinary girl who rose to the occasion through grit. In the 2020 remake, Mulan is born with extraordinary chi that gives her superhuman abilities from childhood. She does not earn her skills. She was born special and merely had to stop hiding it. This fundamentally undermines the original's message. Instead of 'anyone can be a hero through hard work,' the new thesis is 'you were always special, the world just wasn't ready for you.' This is the chosen one narrative, and it carries an unmistakably modern progressive flavor: your identity was always valid, society was wrong to suppress it.
The removal of Li Shang is telling. Disney publicly attributed this to #MeToo concerns, as Shang's authority over Mulan created a problematic power dynamic. They split him into Commander Tung (the mentor) and Chen Honghui (the love interest and peer). The result is that Mulan's romantic partner is no longer her superior but her equal, which is ideologically tidy but dramatically inert. Honghui has none of Shang's complexity.
Xianniang, the witch, is the film's most interesting addition and its most nakedly ideological. She is a woman with the same chi powers as Mulan who was rejected by society for being a powerful woman. She serves the villain because 'a woman like me has no other place.' She is a patriarchy victim turned enforcer for the patriarchy, and her redemptive sacrifice is framed as her recognizing a sister in Mulan. The feminist parallel is drawn with a sledgehammer.
Mushu's absence removes the original's humor and heart. The songs are gone, replaced by a generic orchestral score. The result is a film that takes itself very seriously without earning that gravity. The 1998 original balanced humor, music, heart, and action. The 2020 version is all gravitas and no fun.
To its credit, the traditional elements are real. Mulan's filial piety is genuine. She takes her father's place not for glory but to save his life. The film respects military honor and discipline. Loyalty to nation and family is treated as virtuous. These themes are authentic to the source material and they land.
But the woke additions drag the score. The chi chosen-one framework, the #MeToo-motivated character removals, the sympathetic witch as patriarchy metaphor, and the overwhelmingly non-Chinese creative team making a Chinese story all register as ideological decisions masquerading as artistic ones.
The Xinjiang filming controversy looms over everything. Disney filmed in the same region where the Chinese government was running internment camps for Uyghur Muslims, and thanked Xinjiang propaganda departments in the credits. This is not a scoring factor in our system, but it contextualizes the gap between the film's feminist empowerment messaging and the realities of the regime it chose to collaborate with.
Our verdict: WOKE LEAN with a -3 margin. The traditional bones of Mulan's story prevent a worse score, but the chi chosen-one narrative, the #MeToo character surgery, and the feminist witch subplot tip the balance. This is not a propaganda film. It is a well-intentioned but misguided attempt to modernize a beloved story that did not need modernizing.
RT Critics: 73%. RT Audience: 50%. Metacritic: 66. IMDB: 5.7. Box Office: $69.9 million (COVID-impacted).
Formula: Weighted Score = Severity × Authenticity Multiplier × Centrality Multiplier
🔴 Woke Tropes
| Trope | Severity | Authenticity | Centrality | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Innate Chi Powers / Chosen One Narrative | 4 | Low | High | 10.08 |
| Feminist Messaging / Girl Power Framework | 3 | Moderate | Moderate | 3 |
| Li Shang Removed for #MeToo | 2 | Low | Moderate | 2.8 |
| Xianniang: Sympathetic Witch / Patriarchy Victim | 3 | Moderate | Moderate | 3 |
| Non-Chinese Creative Team on Chinese Story | 2 | Low | Low | 1.4 |
| Mushu Removed (Sanitizing Humor & Charm) | 1 | Moderate | Low | 0.5 |
| TOTAL WOKE | 20.8 | |||
🟢 Traditional Tropes
| Trope | Severity | Authenticity | Centrality | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Filial Piety / Family Duty | 5 | High | High | 6.3 |
| Self-Sacrifice for Family | 4 | High | High | 5.04 |
| Military Honor & Discipline | 3 | High | Moderate | 2.1 |
| Loyalty to Emperor & Nation | 3 | High | Moderate | 2.1 |
| Good vs Evil (Defeating the Khan) | 3 | High | Moderate | 2.1 |
| TOTAL TRADITIONAL | 17.6 | |||
Score Margin: -3 WOKE
Director: Niki Caro
PROGRESSIVE. Caro is a New Zealand filmmaker known for Whale Rider (2002), a female empowerment story about a Maori girl who defies tradition to become chief. She was specifically chosen to bring a feminist lens to Mulan. Her filmography is defined by stories of women overcoming patriarchal systems: North Country (2005) depicted workplace sexual harassment, McFarland USA (2015) dealt with class and racial themes. She publicly described Mulan as a story about a woman 'hiding in plain sight in a man's world.'Niki Caro is a New Zealand filmmaker. Whale Rider (2002) earned her international recognition and an Oscar nomination for lead Keisha Castle-Hughes. She directed North Country (2005) with Charlize Theron, The Zookeeper's Wife (2017), and McFarland USA (2015). Disney hired her in 2017 for Mulan, making her the second woman to direct a Disney live-action remake. She shot the film in New Zealand and China, with the Xinjiang location becoming a major controversy.
Writer: Rick Jaffa, Amanda Silver, Lauren Hynek & Elizabeth Martin
Rick Jaffa and Amanda Silver are a married screenwriting team known for Rise of the Planet of the Apes (2011) and Jurassic World (2015). Lauren Hynek and Elizabeth Martin were brought on specifically for Mulan. The four-writer team is notable for being entirely non-Chinese, which drew criticism. They removed Mushu, the songs, and Li Shang from the original. They added chi superpowers, the witch Xianniang, and a 'chosen one' narrative that replaced the original's hard-work-and-cleverness arc.
Adult Viewer Insight
Parental Guidance
Find Mulan on Amazon Prime Video, rent, or buy:
▶ Stream or Buy on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate, VirtueVigil earns from qualifying purchases.
Community Discussion 0
Subscribe to comment.
Join the VirtueVigil community to share your perspective on this review.