The Lion King
Disney's 2019 Lion King is a technically stunning but emotionally hollow recreation of one of the most traditionally structured stories in the studio's catalog.…
Full analysis below
Want to know what's safe to watch? Get our weekly guide to new reviews and woke-free picks. No spam, ever.
NOT A WOKE TRAP. The Lion King 2019 is essentially a shot-for-shot remake of the 1994 original, which means it inherits one of the most traditionally structured narratives in Disney's catalog. The story of a rightful king reclaiming his throne, honoring his father's legacy, and restoring natural order is conservative to its core. Minor additions like Beyonce's 'Spirit' and a slightly expanded Nala don't alter the fundamental DNA. What you see is what you get.
Our Verdict on The Lion King
Disney's 2019 Lion King is a technically stunning but emotionally hollow recreation of one of the most traditionally structured stories in the studio's catalog. The photorealistic animation is jaw-dropping as pure technology, but the realistic animal faces cannot convey the emotional range that hand-drawn animation delivered in 1994. The lions look real, and real lions do not smile, cry, or emote with their eyebrows.
The story remains virtually unchanged from the original, and that is both the film's greatest strength and its most damning criticism. Simba is still a young prince traumatized by his father's murder at the hands of his treacherous uncle Scar. He still flees into exile, still adopts the carefree 'hakuna matata' lifestyle with Timon and Pumbaa, and still returns to reclaim his throne and restore the natural order of the Pride Lands. The circle of life endures.
From a values perspective, this is one of the most conservative stories Disney has ever told, and the remake preserves it faithfully. The entire narrative is built on monarchy, bloodline succession, natural hierarchy, and a son's duty to honor his father's legacy. Mufasa teaches Simba that being king means responsibility, not privilege. Scar's regime is presented as a violation of the natural order, bringing drought, famine, and decay. When Simba returns and defeats Scar, the rains come and the land heals. The metaphor is not subtle: legitimate authority preserves order, usurpers bring ruin.
The woke additions are negligible. Nala gets a brief scene where she decides to leave the Pride Lands to find help, giving her slightly more agency than in the original. Beyonce contributes 'Spirit,' a new empowerment anthem that plays over a montage of Simba's journey home. 'Be Prepared,' Scar's iconic villain song, is reduced to a brief spoken-word passage. These changes register as minor Hollywood modernization, not ideological subversion.
The voice cast is talented but uneven. James Earl Jones reprises Mufasa with the same commanding gravitas he brought 25 years earlier. Chiwetel Ejiofor brings genuine menace to Scar. Billy Eichner and Seth Rogen are delightful as Timon and Pumbaa. But Beyonce's Nala sounds more like a superstar doing a voiceover than a character living in the story, and Donald Glover's Simba lacks the emotional depth the role demands.
The fundamental problem is that this film exists to make money, not to tell a story that needed retelling. It grossed $1.66 billion worldwide, making it the highest-grossing animated film at the time. Disney got exactly what it wanted. Whether audiences got anything beyond a tech demo with a beloved soundtrack is debatable.
Our verdict: STRONGLY TRADITIONAL with a +23 margin. The Lion King's story is a conservative masterpiece about duty, legacy, natural order, and a son's obligation to his father. The 2019 remake changes almost nothing about this DNA. The minor feminist additions barely register against the overwhelming traditional framework. If you loved the original, the story is exactly the same. Just don't expect the same emotional impact.
RT Critics: 52%. RT Audience: 88%. Metacritic: 55. IMDB: 6.8. Box Office: $1.66 billion.
Woke Tropes & Content Analysis
Formula: Weighted Score = Severity × Authenticity Multiplier × Centrality Multiplier
🔴 Woke Tropes
| Trope | Severity | Authenticity | Centrality | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Expanded Nala / Female Agency | 2 | Moderate | Low | 1 |
| Beyonce's 'Spirit' Empowerment Anthem | 2 | Moderate | Low | 1 |
| 'Be Prepared' Gutted | 1 | High | Low | 0.35 |
| Diversity Voice Casting | 1 | High | Low | 0.35 |
| TOTAL WOKE | 2.7 | |||
🟢 Traditional Tropes
| Trope | Severity | Authenticity | Centrality | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Circle of Life / Natural Order | 5 | High | High | 6.3 |
| Father-Son Legacy & Duty | 5 | High | High | 6.3 |
| Rightful Monarchy / Bloodline Succession | 4 | High | High | 5.04 |
| Good vs Evil (Clear Moral Framework) | 4 | High | Moderate | 2.8 |
| Sacrifice & Parental Love (Mufasa) | 4 | High | Moderate | 2.8 |
| Personal Responsibility & Maturity | 3 | High | Moderate | 2.1 |
| TOTAL TRADITIONAL | 25.3 | |||
Score Margin: +23 TRAD
Director: Jon Favreau
MODERATE. Favreau is a Hollywood centrist who has publicly stated he dislikes political labels. He directed Iron Man (2008), which celebrates capitalism, individualism, and American military innovation. His Jungle Book (2016) was a faithful adaptation. He created The Mandalorian for Disney+, which became a hit with conservative audiences. He avoids culture war provocations and focuses on spectacle and storytelling.Jon Favreau is an American filmmaker, actor, and producer from Queens, New York. He broke through as a writer-actor with Swingers (1996), then moved into directing with Elf (2003). He launched the MCU with Iron Man (2008). After The Jungle Book grossed $966 million, Disney tapped him for The Lion King. He pioneered virtual production technology later used in The Mandalorian. He is one of Disney's most commercially reliable directors with over $5 billion in global box office.
Writer: Jeff Nathanson
Jeff Nathanson is an American screenwriter whose credits include Catch Me If You Can (2002), The Terminal (2004), and Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny (2023). His Lion King script is extremely faithful to the 1994 original by Irene Mecchi, Jonathan Roberts, and Linda Woolverton. Nathanson added extended Timon and Pumbaa comedy, a scene where Nala decides to leave the Pride Lands, and Beyonce's 'Spirit' sequence. Otherwise, the screenplay is nearly identical to the original.
Content Breakdown
Adult Viewer Insight
The Lion King is a photorealistic remake of Disney's 1994 classic. Mufasa's death by stampede remains emotionally intense despite realistic animal faces limiting expressiveness. Hyena attacks and the climactic battle involve animal violence without blood. No sexual content. No language. The values are among the most traditional in Disney's catalog: rightful kingship, the circle of life as natural order, and taking responsibility for one's role in the community.
Parental Guidance
PG for sequences of violence and peril, and some thematic elements. Mufasa's death by stampede remains emotionally intense. Animal battle sequences at the climax involve fighting but no blood. Recommended for ages 6+. The story affirms traditional values: rightful kingship, taking responsibility, and confronting the past. Very young children may find Mufasa's death frightening.
Is The Lion King Safe for Kids?
PG for sequences of violence and peril, and some thematic elements. Mufasa's death by stampede remains emotionally intense. Animal battle sequences at the climax involve fighting but no blood. Recommended for ages 6+. The story affirms traditional values: rightful kingship, taking responsibility, and confronting the past. Very young children may find Mufasa's death frightening.
Find The Lion King on Amazon Prime Video, rent, or buy:
▶ Stream or Buy on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate, VirtueVigil earns from qualifying purchases.
Community Discussion 0
Subscribe to comment.
Join the VirtueVigil community to share your perspective on this review.