Twisters (2024)
Twisters is the summer blockbuster that 2024 needed most: a disaster movie that trusts its audience to enjoy tornadoes without being lectured about the policies that supposedly created them. Director Lee Isaac Chung made this decision consciously and publicly.…
Full analysis belowNOT A WOKE TRAP Twisters is one of the most deliberately counter-programmed blockbusters of recent years. The director explicitly excluded climate change messaging. Glen Powell's Tyler Owens is an unapologetic cowboy hero. Oklahoma is treated with affection and respect.
Twisters is the summer blockbuster that 2024 needed most: a disaster movie that trusts its audience to enjoy tornadoes without being lectured about the policies that supposedly created them. Director Lee Isaac Chung made this decision consciously and publicly. He told Plugged In that he deliberately chose not to address climate change because he did not want viewers to feel preached at. That restraint is not a small thing in 2024 Hollywood. It is a genuine act of counter-programming, and audiences responded. The film grossed 372 million dollars worldwide on a 155 million dollar budget.
Plot Summary
Kate Carter (Daisy Edgar-Jones) is a brilliant meteorologist who quit storm chasing after a devastating accident killed several members of her team, including her boyfriend Jeb. Five years later, she's recruited back to Oklahoma by her former colleague Javi (Anthony Ramos), who is now working with a corporate data company that wants to use advanced sensors to predict tornado behavior. Kate agrees to help, thinking she can stay clinical and scientific about it.
Then she meets Tyler Owens (Glen Powell). Tyler is a rodeo cowboy turned storm chaser with a hundred thousand social media followers, a flatbed truck full of enthusiastic volunteers, and an absolute refusal to let data get in the way of the pure adrenaline of the chase. He is everything Kate is not: instinctive, fearless, funny, and completely in love with tornadoes as a force of nature rather than a problem to be solved.
The plot is exactly what you expect: the two chase systems converge, personal history complicates professional judgment, and when a catastrophic tornado outbreak threatens an Oklahoma town, Kate and Tyler have to work together. It's a romance dressed as a disaster movie dressed as a competition between two ways of seeing the world -- the scientific and the intuitive, the careful and the reckless. The film argues, persuasively, that both have their place.
The tornadoes are extraordinary. Whatever Chung and cinematographer Dan Mindel did to make those sequences feel genuinely terrifying, it worked.
Trope Analysis -- VVWS Weighted Scoring
Woke Tropes
| Trope | Severity (1-5) | Authenticity | Centrality | Weighted Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female lead as the most technically competent character in the film | 2 | High -- her expertise is plot-essential, not agenda-driven | Central | 2.4 |
| Diverse ensemble -- Anthony Ramos as corporate team lead | 1 | Neutral | Supporting | 0.8 |
| Corporate antagonist framing -- Javi's data company subtly positioned as coldly mercenary vs. Tyler's community-first approach | 2 | Moderate | Supporting | 1.6 |
| WOKE TOTAL | 4.8 |
Traditional Tropes
| Trope | Severity (1-5) | Authenticity | Centrality | Weighted Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Masculine heroism -- Tyler is unapologetically cowboy, physically brave, protective, and charming without irony | 5 | High | Defining | 14.0 |
| Oklahoma rural community -- the town, the people, the church in the background, the country music on the radio are all treated with genuine affection | 5 | High | Defining | 10.0 |
| Self-sacrifice -- Tyler and his crew put themselves between the tornado and people who cannot protect themselves | 4 | High | Central | 8.0 |
| Female competence without feminist agenda -- Kate is excellent at her job and the film neither celebrates nor apologizes for this | 3 | High | Central | 4.2 |
| Romance as earned emotional development -- the love story develops through shared danger and respect, not modern relationship politics | 3 | High | Central | 3.6 |
| Community resilience -- Oklahoma farmers, first responders, and neighbors shown as tough, capable, and worth protecting | 3 | High | Supporting | 3.0 |
| Courage as the appropriate response to natural disaster -- the film does not pathologize risk-taking | 2 | High | Supporting | 2.4 |
| TRAD TOTAL | 45.2 |
Director Ideological Track Record
Lee Isaac Chung's previous film, Minari (2020), is one of the most traditionally conservative films to win at Sundance in the last decade -- and it won anyway, which says something about craft transcending politics. Minari is about a Korean immigrant family planting roots in rural Arkansas. It celebrates the American Dream without irony. The father works himself to exhaustion to provide for his family. The grandmother is an anchor of love and wisdom. The land is treated as something sacred. The film is quietly, beautifully patriotic in the deepest sense -- not flag-waving, but showing what it looks like when a family genuinely believes that America is a place worth building a life.
Twisters is a different scale of film but comes from the same director's sensibility. Chung loves communities. He loves the people who work with their hands. He understands instinctively that Oklahoma is not a flyover punchline but a real place full of people whose lives and land matter. That understanding saturates the film's texture in ways that most Hollywood disaster movies never manage.
Mark L. Smith wrote The Revenant -- another film about a man surviving through sheer physical will in a hostile landscape. His scripts tend to be stripped down, action-forward, and respectful of human toughness. No progressive program.
Adult Viewer Insight
Glen Powell is having a moment and Twisters explains why. He has figured out something that very few male stars of his generation have: audiences will happily embrace unambiguous masculine heroism if you deliver it with enough charm and without apologizing for it. Tyler Owens is not a complicated, deconstructed hero. He is a man who chases tornadoes and saves people and loves it. He is also funny, self-aware, and completely at ease in his own skin. In a Hollywood landscape where leading men are constantly being complicated and wounded and problematized, Powell's confidence is genuinely refreshing.
Daisy Edgar-Jones is smart casting as the counterbalance. She brings real intelligence and vulnerability to Kate without making the film a debate about her right to be there. The romance works because both characters earn each other.
For conservative viewers, this is the rare summer blockbuster you can recommend to your whole social circle without qualifications. No climate sermon. No institutional critique. No identity politics. Just two people, a lot of tornadoes, and a community worth saving.
Director: Lee Isaac Chung
Humanist, rural-community focused -- see MinariLee Isaac Chung directed Minari (2020), a beautiful film about a Korean immigrant family farming in rural Arkansas. That film celebrated the American Dream, community, hard work, and family sacrifice. It won the Grand Jury Prize at Sundance and earned multiple Oscar nominations. Chung is not an ideological filmmaker. He is a humanist who loves small communities and the people who keep them alive.
Writer: Mark L. Smith
Mark L. Smith wrote The Revenant (2015). He is a genre craftsman with a gift for survival storytelling and lean, purposeful scripts. No significant ideological track record.
Adult Viewer Insight
Glen Powell has figured out something very few male stars of his generation have: audiences will happily embrace unambiguous masculine heroism if you deliver it with enough charm and without apologizing for it. Tyler Owens is not complicated or wounded or problematized. He chases tornadoes and saves people and loves it. For conservative viewers, this is the rare summer blockbuster you can recommend to your whole social circle without qualifications. No climate sermon. No identity politics. Just two people, a lot of tornadoes, and a community worth saving.
Parental Guidance
Ages 12+ -- PG-13: - Intense tornado sequences with destruction and peril -- not graphic but viscerally scary - Brief depiction of team members dying in a storm (not shown graphically) - Mild romantic tension; no sexual content - Language: mild (a few PG-13 level words) - No substance use of note One of the most family-friendly major action releases of 2024. A genuine throwback to disaster movies that are about the disaster. Teenagers will love it. VirtueVigil Editorial Team Review Date: February 2026
Community Discussion 0
Subscribe to comment.
Join the VirtueVigil community to share your perspective on this review.