I Love Boosters
Boots Riley made Sorry to Bother You in 2018. That film, about a Black telemarketer who discovers his 'white voice' leads him into complicity with something monstrous, was a Marxist nightmare comedy that earned its politics through sheer formal invention. It wasn't subtle. It wasn't trying to be.…
Full analysis below
Want to know what's safe to watch? Get our weekly guide to new reviews and woke-free picks. No spam, ever.
This film draws you in for a significant portion of its runtime with traditional or neutral content before springing its woke agenda. Know before you go!
I Love Boosters is not a woke trap under VVWS v1.1. A woke trap requires the woke content to be hidden until more than 50% of the runtime. Nothing is hidden here. Boots Riley directed Sorry to Bother You, one of the most explicitly Marxist American films of the last decade. His follow-up is marketed as a film about shoplifters targeting a capitalist fashion mogul. IndieWire's review headline calls it a 'Socialist Stoner Comedy.' The New Yorker review calls it a 'Socialist-Surrealist Shoplifting Fantasy.' The film's political premises are front-loaded, visible in the premise, and fully present from the first act. There is no bait-and-switch. This is exactly the film it appears to be.
Our Verdict on I Love Boosters
Boots Riley made Sorry to Bother You in 2018. That film, about a Black telemarketer who discovers his 'white voice' leads him into complicity with something monstrous, was a Marxist nightmare comedy that earned its politics through sheer formal invention. It wasn't subtle. It wasn't trying to be. The horse-men in the third act made certain of that.
I Love Boosters is his follow-up. Eight years and one more film later, he's made the same argument in a new genre: shoplifters as proletarian heroes, a fashion mogul as the face of capital, and a surreal Bay Area as the backdrop for what the IndieWire review correctly called a 'socialist stoner comedy.'
In a heightened version of the San Francisco Bay Area, Corvette (Keke Palmer) runs a crew of boosters, people who steal merchandise and resell it. Their target becomes Christie Smith (Demi Moore), a fashion executive who stole the crew's designs and built a luxury empire on them without credit or compensation. The boosters decide to take her down.
This is redistribution as plot. The film's logic, stated outright in its final act, is that Christie's wealth is stolen in the first place. Taking it back isn't theft. It's justice. Riley is not hiding this argument. He is making it as loudly and as clearly as he knows how.
Riley is a skilled filmmaker. The film is well-shot by Natasha Braier, who gives the Bay Area a heightened, slightly unreal quality that serves Riley's surrealist instincts perfectly. Keke Palmer is excellent. She always is. Her performance as Corvette has the physical intelligence and professional authority of someone who has been running a serious operation for years. She doesn't play Corvette as a Robin Hood moral beacon justifying theft. She plays her as a specialist. That specificity saves the character from becoming a pamphlet.
Naomi Ackie, Taylour Paige, and Poppy Liu fill out the crew with distinct energies. They feel like people with shared history. Demi Moore as Christie Smith is a weaker element, not from performance failure but from character thinness. The script doesn't give Christie an interior life. She exists to be defeated. Her defeat is the political point.
Here is what I Love Boosters is, stated plainly: it is a film that argues wealth redistribution is morally correct, that individual ownership of property is illegitimate when the wealthy possess it, and that capitalism is the central organizing crime of contemporary American life. Boots Riley believes these things. He has believed them his entire adult life. He makes films that argue for them. He is not hiding any of this.
For VirtueVigil readers, I Love Boosters is exactly what it looks like. A $20 million socialist comedy in which shoplifting is heroic, corporations are evil, and the villain is a white female fashion executive with no interior life. The woke content isn't subtext. It's the text.
Tune-Yards' score gives the film its surreal forward momentum. The ensemble works better than the script fully deserves. This is a technically accomplished, ideologically committed film. The VVWS score reflects exactly how accomplished and exactly how committed.
Woke Tropes & Content Analysis
Formula: Weighted Score = Severity × Authenticity Multiplier × Centrality Multiplier
🔴 Woke Tropes
| Trope | Severity | Authenticity | Centrality | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anti-capitalism as central narrative and moral framework | 5 | High | High | 6.3 |
| Glorified wealth redistribution: shoplifting from the rich framed as heroic justice | 4 | High | High | 5.04 |
| Billionaire/corporate class as cartoonish villain with no moral dimension | 4 | High | Moderate | 2.8 |
| Collectivist solidarity over individual achievement as highest moral value | 3 | High | High | 3.78 |
| Predominantly female diverse ensemble as revolutionary class vanguard | 3 | High | Moderate | 2.1 |
| TOTAL WOKE | 20.0 | |||
🟢 Traditional Tropes
| Trope | Severity | Authenticity | Centrality | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Found family: loyalty and solidarity among people who rely on each other | 2 | Moderate | Low | 1 |
| TOTAL TRADITIONAL | 1.0 | |||
Score Margin: -19 WOKE
Director: Boots Riley
STRONGLY WOKE. Boots Riley is one of the most openly Marxist filmmakers working in American cinema. He is a former political activist and musician who founded the hip-hop group The Coup, whose entire catalog is explicitly anti-capitalist. His debut feature Sorry to Bother You (2018) was a surrealist Marxist allegory about labor, self-betrayal, and corporate exploitation, culminating in a literal depiction of workers being transformed into animals for capitalist use. I Love Boosters continues this ideology without interruption. There is no softening, no evolution toward a more moderate position, no attempt to complicate his premises with conservative or traditional counterarguments. He is making films for an audience that shares his politics, and he is doing it with real skill.Boots Riley spent more than a decade making music with The Coup before Sorry to Bother You became one of the most talked-about debut films of 2018. That film cost $3.2 million and earned $17 million worldwide, an impressive return by any measure, while establishing Riley as a filmmaker capable of translating explicitly left political philosophy into formally inventive, commercially viable entertainment. I Love Boosters is his follow-up, eight years later, with Annapurna and Neon backing a $20 million production. The jump in budget reflects the industry's continued appetite for formally inventive cinema even when the politics are far left of the mainstream. Riley's formal gifts are genuine. His films have the surreal energy of someone who grew up on Latin American magical realism and American exploitation cinema simultaneously. His weakness as a filmmaker is also ideological: his politics are so settled that his films have no real dramatic tension at the level of ideas. The outcome is always already decided. The question is only how inventively he gets there.
Content Breakdown
Adult Viewer Insight
The honest creative question about I Love Boosters is whether Boots Riley can make a film that disagrees with him. Sorry to Bother You didn't try. I Love Boosters doesn't try either. His characters who represent capital have no inner lives. His boosters are all warm, brilliant, and right. The political logic is sealed before the film begins. This is competence deployed entirely in service of a predetermined argument. It works as propaganda in the precise sense: it creates an emotional experience that reinforces a worldview rather than challenging it. For audiences who already share Riley's politics, the film is a feature. For everyone else, this is the reason I Love Boosters probably won't reach the broader audience that a filmmaker of Riley's skill could theoretically reach. His films are better than his arguments, and his arguments prevent him from making the best version of his films.
Parental Guidance
Rated R for pervasive language, drug content, and brief sexual content. I Love Boosters is an adult crime comedy with explicitly anti-capitalist politics running throughout. The drug references are comedic and woven through the film's fabric. The heist premise is structured to make shoplifting from wealthy people appear morally correct and heroic. This is a film with a clear political agenda that it presents as obvious moral truth. Not recommended for younger viewers on multiple grounds.
Is I Love Boosters Safe for Kids?
[object Object]
Find I Love Boosters on Amazon Prime Video, rent, or buy:
▶ Stream or Buy on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate, VirtueVigil earns from qualifying purchases.
Community Discussion 0
Subscribe to comment.
Join the VirtueVigil community to share your perspective on this review.