Mean Girls

Our Verdict on Mean Girls

Here's the thing about Mean Girls (2024): it's not the culture war flashpoint that either side wants it to be.

The film is a musical adaptation of a Broadway musical that was itself adapted from a 2004 movie that was based on a nonfiction parenting book. It has been filtered through so many layers of adaptation that the result is less a bold creative statement and more like a photocopy of a photocopy, with some TikTok filters slapped on top.

The plot is identical to the original. Cady Heron (Angourie Rice), a homeschooled kid raised in Kenya, enrolls at a suburban high school and gets pulled into the orbit of the Plastics: Regina George (Reneé Rapp), Gretchen Wieners (Bebe Wood), and Karen Shetty (Avantika). Her real friends, Janis (Auli'i Cravalho) and Damian (Jaquel Spivey), convince her to infiltrate the Plastics and take Regina down from the inside. Cady becomes the thing she set out to destroy. She loses her friends, gets suspended, takes responsibility, joins the Mathletes, wins the state championship, gets crowned Spring Fling Queen, breaks the crown, and gives a speech about how everyone is special.

You know this story. Your mom knows this story. The question is whether this particular retelling justifies its existence.

The answer is: barely. And it's mostly because of Reneé Rapp.

Rapp, who played Regina on Broadway, is the single best reason to watch this film. She brings a volcanic confidence and comedic precision that elevates every scene she's in. Her musical numbers are the film's highlights by a wide margin. When Rapp is on screen, the movie crackles. When she's not, it flatlines into pleasant mediocrity. Angourie Rice is a perfectly competent Cady but lacks the scrappy charm Lindsay Lohan brought to the role. Christopher Briney's Aaron Samuels is forgettable. Bebe Wood's Gretchen is solid. Tim Meadows phones it in as Mr. Duvall, a real disappointment given how funny he was in the original.

The musical numbers range from genuinely fun (Regina's villain songs, the Halloween sequence) to generic and unmemorable. Jeff Richmond's compositions are pop-Broadway competent but not distinctive. You'll tap your feet during the film and forget every melody by the time you reach your car. The spoken dialogue scenes between musical numbers often feel like connective tissue rather than storytelling.

Now, the ideological scorecard.

The most discussed changes from the original are the diversity recasting and the explicit queering of Janis. Three of six main student roles were race-swapped: Janis is now Native Hawaiian, Damian is Black, and Karen is Indian-American. Character surnames were changed accordingly. Janis, who was rumored to be a lesbian in the 2004 film (used as a slur by Regina), is now openly and proudly queer. These are the changes that sparked the 'is Mean Girls 2024 woke?' search traffic.

Here's an honest assessment: the diversity casting is real, deliberate, and ideologically motivated. Changing character names to match new ethnicities signals that this isn't colorblind casting. It's deliberate ethnic rebranding. But does it hurt the movie? Not really. Jaquel Spivey's Damian is arguably an improvement over the original. Avantika's Karen is fun. Cravalho's Janis is strong. The performances work on their own terms.

The more meaningful change is the humor. The 2004 Mean Girls worked because it was ruthlessly equal-opportunity in its satire. It made fun of everyone: popular girls, nerds, teachers, parents, every racial group, every social class. Nobody was safe. The 2024 version has filed down nearly every sharp edge. The Coach Carr statutory rape subplot is gone. The word 'retarded' is gone. 'Dyke' is gone. The racial clique descriptions are sanitized. Jokes that once had bite now arrive pre-chewed.

This is the real cost, and it's not small. The original's genius was that it treated teenagers as smart enough to handle uncomfortable humor. The remake treats them as too fragile for it. The result is a film that is pleasant, safe, and forgettable where the original was sharp, risky, and quotable for two decades running.

There are a few random progressive asides that feel like Tina Fey editorializing: a throwaway line about fracking, another about redlining. Neither has any connection to the plot. They're there, they're noticeable, and they're annoying in the way that any gratuitous political aside is annoying in a teen comedy.

Jazz Jennings makes a blink-and-miss cameo as a 'Social Media Friend.' Megan Thee Stallion appears as herself in social media montages. These are demographic targeting choices more than ideological statements.

But here's what the culture war reading misses: underneath the progressive packaging, the film's moral engine is surprisingly traditional. Cady's corruption by popularity is treated as a genuine moral failing. She doesn't get let off the hook. She gets suspended, loses her friends, and has to earn her way back through effort and accountability. The film takes personal responsibility seriously. Bad behavior has consequences. Redemption requires work, not just feelings.

The message about dumbing yourself down for a boy is explicitly rejected. Aaron calls Cady out for pretending to fail math, and the film treats this as a turning point. Academic achievement is presented as valuable and authentic. The Mathletes victory is played as genuinely triumphant.

Ms. Norbury functions as a credible moral authority. The gym intervention scene, where she forces the girls to confront their cruelty, is played straight and presented as wise. Teachers as moral guides is a deeply traditional concept, and the film respects it.

The social media framing is the film's most genuinely contemporary element. The 2004 version dealt with hallway gossip and physical Burn Books. The 2024 version deals with viral humiliation, Instagram stories, and the permanent digital footprint of cruelty. This update is earned and effective. The horror of online bullying resonates differently than hallway gossip, and the film handles it with reasonable intelligence.

So what do we have? A musical remake that race-swaps half the cast, makes a queer subtext into queer text, removes most of the original's comedic edge, throws in a couple of political asides nobody asked for, but also delivers a morality tale about personal responsibility, academic integrity, and the consequences of cruelty. It's woke-leaning, not woke-drenched. The progressive elements are real but they don't overwhelm the film's fundamentally traditional moral framework.

It made $105 million worldwide on a $36 million budget. It holds a 71% on Rotten Tomatoes. It's a modest commercial success and a critical shrug. It's not the disaster conservatives feared or the triumph progressives wanted. It's a perfectly average musical remake of a comedy classic, carried by one exceptional performance and hampered by the decision to sand down everything that made the original stick.

The original Mean Girls was lightning in a bottle. This one is lightning in a Tupperware container. Same basic ingredients, none of the spark.

Woke Tropes & Content Analysis

Formula: Weighted Score = Severity × Authenticity Multiplier × Centrality Multiplier

🔴 Woke Tropes

Trope	Severity	Authenticity	Centrality	Score
Diversity Recasting of Established Characters	4	0.8	0.8	3.6
Explicit LGBTQ+ Representation (Janis)	4	0.7	0.9	3.8
Sanitized Humor / Self-Censorship	3	1	0.7	2.5
Casual Same-Sex Affection (Background)	2	0.8	0.3	0.8
Single Mother Without Explanation	2	0.9	0.4	0.9
Progressive Political Asides	2	1.2	0.2	0.6
Trans/LGBTQ+ Activist Cameo	1	1	0.2	0.3
Girl Power / Female Solidarity Messaging	3	0.7	0.9	2.4
Sexualized Minors for Comedy	2	0.6	0.5	1
TOTAL WOKE				15.9

🟢 Traditional Tropes

Trope	Severity	Authenticity	Centrality	Score
Consequences for Bad Behavior	4	0.8	1	3.8
Redemption Through Personal Responsibility	4	0.8	0.9	3.2
Academic Achievement Rewarded	2	0.7	0.6	1.1
Authenticity Over Social Status	2	0.6	0.5	0.8
Teacher as Moral Authority	2	0.7	0.4	0.7
TOTAL TRADITIONAL				9.6

Score Margin: -6 WOKE

Content Breakdown

Is Mean Girls Safe for Kids?