Maria
Maria (2024) is the third film in Pablo Larrain's unofficial biographical trilogy of iconic women who lived under the weight of impossible public expectation. Jackie examined the widow. Spencer examined the princess. Maria examines the diva.
Full analysis belowMaria (2024) does not qualify as a woke trap. The film's margin is a solid +9 TRAD with a TRADITIONAL LEAN verdict. The woke signals present are historically grounded in Maria Callas's actual life: the male-dominated opera world that constrained her, her complicated relationship with Onassis, and the psychological toll of an uncompromising artistic career. None of these are ideological insertions. Pablo Larrain is telling a story about a real woman who genuinely experienced these things. The film's traditional core, its reverence for artistic excellence as a sacred calling and its meditation on love, sacrifice, and mortality, is stronger than its incidental feminist framing. No trap.
Our Verdict on Maria
Maria (2024) is the third film in Pablo Larrain's unofficial biographical trilogy of iconic women who lived under the weight of impossible public expectation. Jackie examined the widow. Spencer examined the princess. Maria examines the diva.
And by diva I mean the original meaning of the word: a goddess. Someone whose gift was so total, so overwhelming in its claims on her life, that ordinary human existence became almost impossible to sustain alongside it.
Maria Callas died in Paris on September 16, 1977. She was 53. She had not performed publicly in years. Her voice, once the standard against which every other soprano in the world was measured, had deteriorated to the point where she could no longer trust it. What she could do, and what Larrain's film captures with genuine ache, is remember what it sounded like.
Angelina Jolie plays Callas in her final week. It's a performance that's going to divide people. Jolie is not a trained operatic soprano; the singing you hear is Callas's own archival recordings, not Jolie's voice. What Jolie is doing is something different: she's performing the experience of living inside a body that once could do something transcendent and can no longer. The mouth moves. The voice that comes out is from thirty years earlier. There's something genuinely heartbreaking in that disjunction, and Jolie finds it.
Steven Knight's screenplay structures the film around two anchoring conceits. The first: Callas is attempting one final recording, a private coda to her career, and the film follows her preparations for and disappointment with this effort. The second: she is visited regularly by a hallucinated journalist named Mandrax, played by Kodi Smit-McPhee with an unsettling sweetness that perfectly captures the gentle seduction of drug dependency. Mandrax is simultaneously Callas's interviewer, her confessor, and her slow executioner. Knight's decision to personify her addiction as a sympathetic male companion is one of the film's most quietly devastating ideas.
The Paris setting is everything. Lachman's cinematography treats the city as both a sanctuary and a prison. Callas's apartment, gorgeous and frozen, is filled with evidence of a life that peaked elsewhere and decades ago. Photographs of performances. Correspondence from Onassis. The particular silence of a woman who once commanded opera houses and now has only her memory and her housekeeper.
Haluk Bilginer appears in flashback sequences as Aristotle Onassis, and the film handles their relationship with careful ambivalence. Onassis was the great love of Callas's life and also the person who damaged her most deeply. He left her for Jackie Kennedy. The film doesn't editorialize about this. It simply shows what it cost her. That restraint is admirable.
The traditional values in Maria are not incidental. They are the film's structural foundation. Callas believed in excellence as a religious obligation. She believed that her voice was not her property but her responsibility. She suffered for her art not because suffering was fashionable but because the art demanded it. This is an ancient, deeply un-progressive idea: that greatness requires sacrifice, that the gift is larger than the gifted, that you owe your talent more than it owes you.
The feminist framing exists. Callas operated in a world that treated female artists as ornaments. Onassis treated her as an acquisition. The opera world celebrated her voice while diminishing her personhood. These things are true of her historical experience and the film depicts them. But the film never reduces Callas to a victim of patriarchy. It's too interested in her complexity for that. She was not passive. She was not simply acted upon. She chose, she fought, she sometimes destroyed herself in the choosing. The film honors the agency in that, even when the agency was self-destructive.
Is this a VirtueVigil recommend? For the right viewer, absolutely. Not for families with young children; the film is too melancholy, too internally focused, and too emotionally dense. But for adults who love classical music, who are interested in what it costs to be genuinely great at something, who find value in films that meditate on mortality with grace: this is a rich film. Jolie earned her Oscar nomination. The film earned its place in Larrain's biography-trilogy. And Maria Callas, whose recordings provide the film with its most overwhelming emotional moments, earned her legend.
Woke Tropes & Content Analysis
Formula: Weighted Score = Severity × Authenticity Multiplier × Centrality Multiplier
🔴 Woke Tropes
| Trope | Severity | Authenticity | Centrality | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female artist constrained by male-dominated institution | 3 | High | Moderate | 2.1 |
| Marriage and romantic partnership depicted as constraint on female selfhood | 2 | High | Moderate | 1.4 |
| Mental health and psychological fragmentation as sympathetic focus | 2 | High | Moderate | 1.4 |
| TOTAL WOKE | 4.9 | |||
🟢 Traditional Tropes
| Trope | Severity | Authenticity | Centrality | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Artistic excellence as sacred calling requiring total sacrifice | 5 | High | High | 6.3 |
| Classical femininity honored | 3 | High | Moderate | 2.1 |
| Love as life-organizing purpose, including its costs | 3 | High | High | 3.78 |
| Mortality and decline faced with dignity and grace | 3 | High | Moderate | 2.1 |
| TOTAL TRADITIONAL | 14.3 | |||
Score Margin: +9 TRAD
Director: Pablo Larrain
MIXED LEANING WOKE. Larrain is a Chilean filmmaker whose work consistently returns to women under pressure: figures from history who resist, break, or collapse under the weight of expectation. Jackie (2016) is a sympathetic portrait of Jacqueline Kennedy in the days following JFK's assassination. Spencer (2021) depicts Princess Diana as a captive of the Royal Family and is arguably his most politically charged film, a sustained critique of institutional power over the female body. Neruda (2016) is hagiographic toward the communist Chilean poet. El Conde (2023) reimagines Pinochet as an immortal vampire, which is not a subtle political statement. Maria follows this pattern: Larrain chooses women whose lives were shaped by forces beyond their control. The progressive read is baked into his subject matter. What redeems Maria from outright woke categorization is Larrain's craft: he does not turn Callas into a symbol. He turns her into a person.Pablo Larrain was born in Santiago, Chile in 1976. He emerged through the Chilean cinema circuit before achieving international recognition with No (2012), his film about the 1988 Chilean plebiscite that ended Pinochet's rule. From there, he built what critics have called a biographical trilogy of iconic women: Jackie, Spencer, and now Maria. What unites these films is Larrain's method: rather than conventional cradle-to-grave biopics, he isolates a short, intense period in his subject's life and uses that window to excavate the full person. Jackie focuses on five days following JFK's death. Spencer covers three days of Christmas at Sandringham. Maria covers roughly the last week of Maria Callas's life in 1977 Paris. Each film is more hallucination than biography. Larrain is interested in psychological interiority, not factual record. His collaborations with Natalie Portman on Jackie, Kristen Stewart on Spencer, and Angelina Jolie on Maria are characterized by performances he demands be extreme and unguarded. The results are sometimes brilliant and sometimes self-indulgent. Maria lands closer to brilliant. As a political filmmaker, Larrain's instincts lean left. But his instincts as a craftsman and artist are stronger than his instincts as an ideologue, and Maria is a film made by a craftsman.
Producers
- Juan de Dios Larrain (Fabula) — Pablo Larrain's brother and longtime producing partner. Juan de Dios produced Jackie and Spencer as well. The Larrain brothers operate as an artistic unit, with Juan de Dios providing the structural support that allows Pablo's more idiosyncratic directorial instincts to exist at a budgetary level that attracts stars like Portman, Stewart, and Jolie. There is no ideological signal in his producing history beyond whatever's implied by consistent collaboration with his brother.
- Netflix (Netflix) — Netflix acquired Maria for distribution, which is a mixed ideological signal at the distribution level. Netflix's original content tends to lean progressive. As a distributor of existing films rather than a developer here, their influence on the content is minimal. Maria is the film Pablo Larrain made with Steven Knight and Angelina Jolie. Netflix bought the rights to that film. The content was already determined.
Full Cast
Content Breakdown
Adult Viewer Insight
What Maria gets right, and what makes it a quietly traditional film despite its progressive director, is its insistence that greatness is real. We live in an era when the concept of artistic genius is increasingly suspect: when excellence is reframed as privilege, when the dedicated artist's willingness to sacrifice ordinary life is pathologized as disordered, when the very idea that some people are simply better at things than other people makes audiences uncomfortable. Maria refuses all of that. Callas was genuinely, incomparably better at something than virtually anyone else alive in her era. The film worships her gift without apologizing for the word worship. It takes seriously the idea that extraordinary talent is both a calling and a burden, and that the burden is not imposed by society but inherent to the gift itself. For adults who have watched any serious art form grapple with mediocrity dressed up as inclusion, Maria reads as a corrective. It says: some people are operating at a level others are not. That is not oppressive. That is true. Honoring it is also true.
Parental Guidance
Rated PG-13 for thematic content, brief strong language, and drug use. Maria is a slow, interior biographical drama about grief, artistic decline, and mortality. Not appropriate for children. Teenagers may find it opaque without background knowledge of Maria Callas's historical significance. The drug dependency subplot is handled with restraint but is persistent throughout the film. No significant sexual content or violence. The emotional content, a woman confronting the end of her life and the loss of her defining gift, is heavy but not exploitative. Parents who want to introduce older teens to classical music or 20th-century European cultural history may find value in watching alongside them.
Is Maria Safe for Kids?
[object Object]
Find Maria on Amazon Prime Video, rent, or buy:
▶ Stream or Buy on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate, VirtueVigil earns from qualifying purchases.
Community Discussion 0
Subscribe to comment.
Join the VirtueVigil community to share your perspective on this review.