The Piano Lesson
August Wilson is underrated in contemporary culture. Not by academics or theater people, who treat him with the respect he deserves. But by the broader culture that increasingly equates Black American storytelling with contemporary progressive politics. Wilson's work does not fit that mold.…
Full analysis belowThe Piano Lesson does not qualify as a woke trap. The margin is positive (+5 TRAD), automatically disqualifying it under VVWS v1.1 criteria. The film's values orientation, centered on family legacy, ancestral obligation, and a man's drive to own land, is evident from its premise and marketing as an August Wilson adaptation. No hidden bait and switch.
August Wilson is underrated in contemporary culture. Not by academics or theater people, who treat him with the respect he deserves. But by the broader culture that increasingly equates Black American storytelling with contemporary progressive politics. Wilson's work does not fit that mold. His plays are about property, ancestry, obligation, masculine purpose, and the cost of forgetting where you came from. Those are not progressive themes. They are ancient themes. Which makes The Piano Lesson, adapted for Netflix by Malcolm Washington and arriving in 2024, a useful corrective.
The setup: Boy Willie Charles (John David Washington) arrives from Mississippi at the Pittsburgh home of his sister Berniece (Danielle Deadwyler) and Uncle Doaker (Samuel L. Jackson) with a plan. He wants to sell the family piano, an heirloom carved by his enslaved great-great-grandfather with portraits of the family, and use the money to buy the land in Mississippi where their family was once enslaved. Own the land. Build something. Stop living on someone else's property.
Berniece refuses. The piano is the family's history. It was stolen from a white family at the cost of two of their relatives' lives. You do not sell the blood of your ancestors.
This is the central argument of the play, and it is not one with a clear winner. Wilson is not making a simple case for one side. Boy Willie is not wrong. Berniece is not wrong. They are both right about different things, and the tension between them, the obligation to the past versus the obligation to the future, is something every family that has ever argued about what to do with an inheritance will recognize.
The film earns TRADITIONAL LEAN because its fundamental values are traditional ones. Ancestral obligation is not a progressive concept. The idea that you owe something to the dead who paid a price so you could live is not a progressive concept. Boy Willie's hunger to own land, to plant his feet in a place that belongs to him, is one of the oldest masculine drives in human civilization. The film honors all of this without irony.
Malcolm Washington directs with real authority for a debut feature. He keeps the chamber-drama energy of the play alive while expanding the physical world. Samuel L. Jackson does the quiet work here: Doaker is the keeper of the family's history, and Jackson plays him with the kind of gravity that comes from actually understanding what you're carrying. John David Washington as Boy Willie is the film's engine, funny and infuriating and ultimately more than the loudmouth he appears to be. Danielle Deadwyler is very good. The ensemble is uniformly strong.
The supernatural finale, where Berniece finally plays the piano to call on the ancestors to cast out the ghost that has been terrorizing the house, is handled with conviction. Branford Marsalis's score does not signal horror. It signals presence. The ancestors in this film are not demons. They are invested. The film believes in them. That spiritual dimension, the idea that the dead have a legitimate claim on the living, is not a modern progressive position. It is very old.
The woke trope score reflects the film's framing of slavery and racial oppression as the primary identity lens for the characters. That framing is present and authentic, but it is not the film's only or even primary interest. Wilson uses history to talk about human beings, not the other way around. The net margin is +5 TRAD, which is correct.
This is a serious film made with care about material that deserves care. It is not perfect. The pacing sags slightly in the middle and the first-time direction occasionally leans on the source material rather than fully translating it. But as an introduction to August Wilson for audiences who have not read the plays, it is exactly what it needs to be.
Formula: Weighted Score = Severity × Authenticity Multiplier × Centrality Multiplier
🔴 Woke Tropes
| Trope | Severity | Authenticity | Centrality | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slavery and racial oppression as the primary identity framework | 2 | High | High | 2.52 |
| Systemic racism as explanatory lens for family conflict and individual choice | 2 | High | Moderate | 1.4 |
| TOTAL WOKE | 3.9 | |||
🟢 Traditional Tropes
| Trope | Severity | Authenticity | Centrality | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ancestral legacy and family honor as binding moral obligation | 3 | High | High | 3.78 |
| Man's drive to own land and build a future through honest work | 2 | High | High | 2.52 |
| Family bonds and communal loyalty honored above personal gain | 2 | High | Moderate | 1.4 |
| Spiritual and ancestral dimension treated as real and authoritative | 1 | Moderate | Moderate | 1 |
| TOTAL TRADITIONAL | 8.7 | |||
Score Margin: +5 TRAD
Director: Malcolm Washington
MIXED, LEANING TRADITIONAL. Malcolm Washington is August Wilson's grandson making his feature directorial debut adapting his grandfather's work. The ideological framing of the film is largely August Wilson's, not Hollywood's. Wilson's plays are rooted in Black American experience but they are not progressive in the contemporary sense. His worldview is about family obligation, ancestral debt, masculine purpose, spiritual continuity, and the cost of forgetting where you came from. Malcolm Washington is faithful to that worldview, which makes this a more traditionally grounded film than its Netflix pedigree might suggest.Malcolm Washington previously directed music videos and shorts. This is his first feature, and it is a serious debut. He handles the ensemble with assurance, keeps the film's theatrical origins present without making it feel like a filmed stage play, and stages the supernatural finale with real conviction. What he brings beyond craft is something harder to teach: he clearly understands what the play is actually about, and he makes sure the film communicates it.
Adult Viewer Insight
Wilson's Pittsburgh Cycle asks a version of the same question in every play: what do Black Americans owe to the history that made them, and what does that history owe to them in return? The Piano Lesson gives the most direct answer of any play in the cycle: the debt runs both ways. The piano is not just a symbol of suffering. It is a symbol of survival. The ancestors carved their faces into it so they would not be forgotten. Berniece has been too afraid to play it. When she finally plays it at the end, she is not just driving out a ghost. She is paying the debt she has been avoiding. Adult viewers who think about the nature of inherited obligation, financial, spiritual, historical, will find the film richer than its Netflix drama packaging suggests.
Parental Guidance
Rated PG-13 for thematic content and brief language. Appropriate for teens 13+ and families. One of the more thematically rich films VirtueVigil has reviewed at this rating level. The material about ancestry, legacy, and obligation is appropriate for teenage viewers and can generate meaningful family conversation.
Find The Piano Lesson on Amazon Prime Video, rent, or buy:
▶ Stream or Buy on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate, VirtueVigil earns from qualifying purchases.
Community Discussion 0
Subscribe to comment.
Join the VirtueVigil community to share your perspective on this review.